I was browsing through The Star Online and came across this news article.
...Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said the new curriculum would replace the existing primary school integrated curriculum (KBSR), which was first introduced in 1983 and subsequently reviewed in 2000.
“The new curriculum will be based on six key areas to produce holistic individuals,” he told reporters after releasing the third report card based on the National Education Blueprint 2006-2010.
The six areas were: communication; spiritual attitude and values; humanitarianism; science and technology literacy; physical and aesthetics; and personal development….
Correct me if I’m wrong but shouldn’t spiritual attitude and values of a student be coached by their own families instead of the school? Everyone is entitled to their own believes of spiritualism. Personally, I don’t think it is something that should be forced on the students, especially at such a young age.
I do agree with the less examination-oriented part of education and though I applaud the Government for finally realising that there should be a change in the norm of education that has lasted over the last 50 years, I still think that there should be more research and understanding done on the quality of education and the end results that one desires for the future of our generation before anything concrete is set on stone.
…Elaborating further, Education director-general Datuk Alimuddin Mohd Dom told The Star that Year One pupils in 50 schools nationwide have been using the new curriculum under a pilot project.
He said the pupils were being assessed using several approaches, including psychometric tests, school-based assessments and achievements in extra-curricular activities and sports….
There are a lot of emphasis placed on a student’s achievements in extra-curricular activities and sports. But what I think the Government should bear in mind is the fact that NOT ALL students gravitate around extra-curricular activities and sports. How are the teachers going to assessed this criteria properly? If a student shows great potential in other areas but fail miserably in this particular area, does that mean he or she is a poor student? I hate to stereotype and divide growing up children or students into groups but at the end of the day, there are jocks and bookworms who may excel in their own categories but do not do well in other categories no matter how hard you push them to.
I don’t care if I’m making any sense here. Education is something I feel strongly about. It is something that the bf and I have debated on many, many times – trying to think of a rational way the Government can look into to revamped the education system to be more relevant to the real world instead of a world of theories, hypotheticals and regurgitation. It’s not an easy task, that I admit. I just hope that this new curriculum for primary school students is not something the Government just whipped out out of the blue without proper study and understanding. Remember how chaotic things were for students who had to do study Science and Math both in Malay and English?